A Re-Understanding of World War Two
This article is the continuation of our series on the relationship between world history and symbolism. Previous installments have taken us from modern Russia, Iran, and all the way back to the Hittite and Phoenician Empires. The revelations and patterns which are emerging from this research are massive. The subject and content of each piece is decided in a flurry of flashing images and connections which twist and turn around the long road of human experience. There is so much to write and communicate that a book of some sort will eventually be required. But for now the POM platform will suffice, as we work together to rebuild the landscape and redirect our understanding of what it means to be a learning spiritual being.
Some readers have a lot of questions about the material being presented. These will be answered in time as we practice patience and remain open to the exploration of knowledge and the enhancement of self-awareness. Other readers are using each installment as a springboard for further research, connections, and understanding. This should be applauded and encouraged as the scope of this re-understanding of world history is beyond the capabilities of one person.
Over the last 4 years we have discussed vast monetary, geopolitical, and esoteric topics. These fragments have hinted at some of the larger revelations which will come forth throughout this series. Near the end of our travels we will discover that these multiple topics and discussions have in fact been one ongoing topic and discussion all along. It is a conversation which has been taking place inside the human framework since the dawn of consciousness. It is the light inside the darkness attempting to become free.
It is important to understand the influence which cultures have upon one another. In most cases an invading and conquering culture will fragment and shatter the other. But the dominant culture will absorb some of the characteristics of the subservient culture. It is also observable that cultures which successfully defend against an invading force will often times develop some of the characteristics of the outside aggressor. This happens through non-combative means, as socioeconomic and religious practices are exchanged on multiple levels. The common pattern is that human strengths and weaknesses can develop and jump from culture to culture through the same process which takes place between individuals.
This back and forth in world history and human relations make it difficult to define and determine anchor points in the overall timeline. Something which began as good can turn bad without much fanfare, or acknowledgement of the subtle corruption from within.
In the last installment titled The Resurrection of the Phoenician Empire we reviewed how the Phoenicians built a vast trading network and used that economic leverage to suppress and manipulate other cultures and empires. This empire developed the seeds of our modern system of laws, which are still in use today. There is evidence they traveled around the world and left their impression and influence upon the peoples and cultures they encountered and conquered.
One such culture was the Anglo-Saxons. It has been widely studied and proven that the Phoenician culture influenced the Anglo-Saxon culture to a great extent. This is the transference of one cultures characteristic to another. We will see this pattern repeat over and over as the world adversarial force jumps from one region to another. This force will even operate in two opposing nations or empires simultaneously in order to leverage assets and ensure access to resources.
One example of this is the Nazi invasion of Russia. Western banking and corporate interests supported the creation and expansion of Nazism. This irreconcilable fact has been the subject of much speculation and research. But once Great Britain declared war on Germany the reluctance on America’s part to join the war became even more concerning. It was only when Germany’s defeat in the Battle of Moscow became obvious that America finally joined the war.
The Battle of Moscow took place between October of 1941 and January of 1942. Hitler went all in on invading Russia while still fighting on the Western front. This fateful decision has always been debated amongst historians. But what is never noticed is the timeframe surrounding the inevitable German loss in Russia and the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Russia launched its decisive counteroffensive on December 5, 1941. It was obvious at that point the Germans were beat and would not be able to hold their defensive positions. The defeat of Germany on the Eastern front was a certainty, and two days later, on December 7, 1941, the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. Evidence proves that America knew this attack was going to happen and allowed it to take place as a pretext to enter the war.
Using the thesis of this series as our anchor point and filter to analyze these events, we can conclude that Russia, the nation that has never been successfully invaded and conquered by the world adversarial force, once again had to defend itself with the Nazi invasion. The power behind Nazi Germany supporting Hitler through Western banks and corporations used Germany, as in previous centuries, as a hammer against Russia.
The threat of losing all of Eastern Europe to Russia as the Germans were pushed back towards Berlin was one of the foremost reasons for America entering the war. As horrible as the loss of Eastern Europe would be, the loss of Western Europe to Russia would be an historical defeat which could not be allowed.
The world adversarial force, using its main chess pieces, once again as in previous centuries, needed the unharmed and energized American forces to drive a wedge right through the middle of the German western positions and reclaim as much of the assets and resources as possible before it all fell into the hands of the Russians. The rush towards Berlin was on from both sides.
One of the obvious questions which come to mind under this scenario is the German attack on Great Britain. This came after Britain declared war on Germany, but we must consider that some of this may have been staged and serving a purpose other than the defeat of Germany. Britain itself was likely unaware of the larger moves taking place, as the burning torch of power had already been passed to America during the interwar years.
Additionally, it has been suggested that Hitler could have invaded England, and for reasons which are still being debated, decided against it. War with England though did provide Germany with the opportunity to target practice its new weapons – the V1 and V2 rockets.
The relationship between America and Britain, while supporting Germany’s military buildup, is an example of how multiple nations and cultures are used at the same time to further the goals and objectives of the world adversarial force. We should not assume that because two nations are at war with one another that one represents the single-headed eagle while the other represents the double-headed eagle. There will always be a primary leader with subsidiary knight and pawn nations which can take the full brunt of the wars and socioeconomic transformations.
We explored a similar dynamic in the last piece. The world adversarial force used the Phoenician Empire to conquer most of the Middle East and the Mediterranean region. The Phoenicians in turn used the Sea People as their tool to pick off the low hanging fruit and shift trade routes. This is the same as America being the Phoenicians of the modern world, and they in turn are using smaller nations in the subservient roles.
Isn’t it interesting how America never faced a brute frontal attack in any of the wars over the last century? Even now, with the mass Sunni migration into Europe, Canada, and other western nations, America is being spared the full onslaught. But history has shown us that this will not remain the case forever.
Re-understanding World War Two under this thesis would suggest that it was the continuation of the thousand year’s war between those who rally under the double-headed eagle emblem and those of the single-headed eagle.
A reader asked a question in a previous installment about the Phoenician Empire, and how both it and Rome, could be at war with one another when both represented the world adversarial force under the banner of the single-headed eagle. Outside of what was explained above, it is important to point out that the Phoenician Empire in essence ended when the Persians (under the double-headed eagle flag) defeated and fragmented the empire in 539 BC.
The Punic Wars, which took place between 264 BC and 146 BC were the forces attempts to regain control over the region through its new primary power base in Rome. The transference of culture, and the transformation of culture, are one and the same. The same symbols and religious customs transfer each time with slight modifications and considerations to get the host culture to accept and implement the new system of laws and beliefs.
It is worth mentioning that the ancient Roman monarchy was overthrown in the year 509 BC. This was 60 years after the Phoenician Empire ended under the invasion of Persian King Cyrus. The event has a similar feel and taste as the revolutions and wars which overthrew other monarchies in Europe centuries later, and represented the transition point for the world adversarial force. Though the planning and staging of the transference happened even before the end of the Phoenician Empire, as such strategies and actions require years of legal and economic implementation coordinated with cultural infiltration, before the full results are realized. It should not go without notice either that after the Roman monarchy was replaced the new rulers enacted vast liberal reforms, expanded its military forces, and gained control of the Roman treasury. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?
This brings us back to the Phoenician influence on the developing Anglo-Saxon culture. You see how this force manipulates different cultures and implements varying strategies simultaneously. The original intent of this article was to present information which would make the connections between the King Arthur legend, John F. Kennedy, and what is happening now between American and Russia under the Trump Presidency. This is how easy it is to get off track with this thesis. As stated, there is so much information and connections. We will pick this up in the next installment, where we will also explore the Camelot narrative and the real definition of the Holy Grail.
Of course, the connection between all of the above, and the Knights Templar, who flew the double-headed eagle flag, will be made clear. There is so much more. - JC
Other articles in this series are:
The Destruction of Russia (FREEPOM)
The World's Oldest Symbol (FREEPOM)
The Resurrection of the Phoenician Empire (PREMIUM POM)
JC Collins can be contacted at email@example.com
This article is copyrighted by POM Media©2017. As non-Premium content it can be shared and reposted without further permission.
Please subscribe for Premium Content.