How the Cultural War Fooled the Left (FREEPOM)

Cultural, FREEPOM50 Comments

In celebration of POM being awarded the Top 100 Philosophy Blogs in the world, I'm re-posting this article from July as FREEPOM.  It proved to be extremely popular and is worth revisiting now as we move closer to election day.  - JC 

A Synthesis between Opposing Extremes

By JC Collins

The ongoing rise of a new modern nationalism across the global and political spectrums is serving the purpose of the international banking interests.  The social justice warriors and leftist politicians who have suckled on the socialist nipple of division and fragmentation have been betrayed by the very same people and organizations who originally funded the fake cultural war.

The very same governments and non-governmental organizations who orchestrated and implemented everything from the feminist movement to the recent transgender conditioning are the very same interests who are promoting open borders and mass immigration.  These policies are fast undoing decades of cultural and socioeconomic interception (CSI).

A reconciliation between the ideals of feminism and the incremental approach of sharia law through mass immigration is impossible.  The obvious question which emerges is why would a specific interest group promote opposing ideals and social movements?

Another related question which can help bring focus to the methodology being discussed is the cultural attack on Christianity alongside the self-destructive behavior of Islam which is being allowed and imported into Christian cultures.

The obvious answer is that both are meant to transform the other.  A few decades from now both the Christian religion and the Islamic faith will be destroyed and replaced with the inevitable synthesis of the consolidation of both.  This is the thesis and anti-thesis becoming the synthesis.

The simple terminology of the above dynamic is running parallel to the introduction of the eastern belief systems into the Christian world.  This new age Buddhism introduction began decades ago and has reached a very common balance amongst the core population in the west.

The same methodology is playing out in the political realm.  The politics of the left and the politics of the right serve the same thesis and anti-thesis movement towards synthesis.  It is obvious.  The population is divided and fragmented along well defined fault lines.  You are either pro-life or pro-choice.  You are either pro-guns or anti-guns.

The same script is used to thoroughly manipulate the masses into accepting a well-engineered and purposeful synthesis which moves everyone into the middle ground.  The extremes which exist on both ends of the religious and political spectrums are so unforgiving and destructive in their promotion that a balance will provide the tired populations with a viable solution to the ongoing troubles and divisions in the world.

While those on the left thought they were winning some make-believe cultural war the international banking interest who are engineering the world of tomorrow have been using them and the manufactured cultural war to create an extreme position which is strategically placed in opposition to the similar manufactured right.

The difference is that the left thought they were winning while the right thought they were losing.  One was an offensive movement while the other was defensive.  Both movements are creating a middle ground.

The rise of Trump and the anti-immigration movements around the world are the first shifts to the center.

In America politicians are even openly stating that Donald Trump is not a true conservative and with his nomination the Republican Party has forever been changed.  The same script is being applied to the Democrats.  Hillary Clinton’s nomination and the subsequent failure of her Presidential run will alter American politics.

The false cultural war was a ruse to manufacture an internationalist middle ground which would re-organize American politics and culture to have it more aligned with the globalist agenda of consolidation and world governance.  Both left and right were used but none more so than the left which thought they were actually winning some meaningful culture war against the old world.

The betrayal is already being felt as the left begins to feast on itself.  - JC

trump-lion

Help support POM and further research by subscribing.  Members will receive more detailed analysis on macroeconomic trends and discussions on esoteric philosophy.

SUBSCRIBE

Monthly subscription cost of $15.00 or receive a 33% discount with a one year subscription cost of $120.00.

14632841_1430806786947867_5447774401936845420_n

50 Comments on “How the Cultural War Fooled the Left (FREEPOM)”

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax6uWoEuf0s

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-production-11-00684-pg-127-128/
    Classified by Director A/GIS/IPS, Acting, DoS on 10/30/2015 ~ Class: CONFIDENTIAL ~ Reason: 1.4(D) ~ Declassify on: 07/15/2024

    That right there my friends is a classified email.

    Office of Origin: A/GIS/IPS
    a. Information may not be considered for classification unless it concerns one or more of the classification categories set forth in Section 1.4 of E.O. 13526. The reason(s) for classification must be given for original classification marking but are optional for derivative classification. Choose one of the following reasons from the choices on the top right of the SMART classification screen ;
    1.4(d) foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources;

    1. with regards to that youtube video posted above the self-incriminating evidence by Hillary starts at 0:11. Pay real close attention to her words - because here is the classification required for that particular email 1.4(d) that she was "certainly well aware of"..

  2. Also on another note I have never been to that side of the planet, let alone USA. What pray tell is the electoral college lol. I thought Africa was blatantly corrupt. Now I know at least we are honest in our corruption 🙂

    1. Lol. Peter I've lived in America most of my life and can't say I knew any more about the Electoral College than you so far away. Sad in and of itself.

      But what I can take from this experience is that back some 200 or so years ago it was realized that some people took the process seriously enough to understand the ideas presented in the different parties in order to vote to choose which way our society goes from that point in time.

      I would suspect that we weren't much different back then than we are now. Social media then was the local tavern and such.

      But the deplorables may be a reference to "unqualified voters".

      What I haven't found yet is whether a mishap has to occur in the people's voting process in order to justify moving to the Electoral College vote. Or if it just goes there and the people's voting is just a pacefier to make them feel inclusive of the process.

  3. It's really not difficult to connect the dots between Hillary, Huma, the Clinton Foundation and the muslim brother/sisterhood which leads into that Sharia/Shariah Law we were talking about a while ago. And Wieners lust problems allowed it all to come into the light.

    "In a letter dated June 13, 2012, to the State Department Inspector General, five Republican members of Congress—Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Trent Franks of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Thomas J. Rooney of Florida, and Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia—claimed that Abedin "has three family members – her late father, her mother and her brother – connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations."[23][24][25] The five members of Congress alleged that Abedin had "immediate family connections to foreign extremist organizations" which they said were "potentially disqualifying conditions for obtaining a security clearance" and questioned why Abedin had not been "disqualified for a security clearance."[24]

    The claims in the letter were generally rejected, and were labeled by some as conspiracy theories.[23][26] The Washington Post editorial board called the allegations "paranoid," a "baseless attack," and a "smear."[23] The letter was also criticized by, among others, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Representative Keith Ellison, Democrat of Minnesota, the first Muslim member of Congress, who called the allegation "reprehensible."[27] Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, also rejected the allegations, saying "The letter and the report offer not one instance of an action, a decision or a public position that Huma has taken while at the State Department that would lend credence to the charge that she is promoting anti-American activities within our government....These attacks on Huma have no logic, no basis and no merit."[27] Bachmann's former campaign manager Ed Rollins said the allegations were "extreme and dishonest" and called for Bachmann to apologize to Abedin.[28] The Anti-Defamation League condemned the letter, calling upon the Representatives involved to "stop trafficking in anti-Muslim conspiracy theories."[29]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huma_Abedin

    Brother, Hassan Abedin is currently an associate editor with the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA),

    Mom, a college professor holding a doctorate.

    Dad, an author who coauthored "Christian-Muslim Relations: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow"

    http://www.abebooks.com/Christian-Muslim-Relations-Yesterday-Today-Tomorrow-Contemporary/17181396456/bd

    I've not yet researched deep enough to know how this group feels about sharia/shariah law though.

    Findings so far...

    "The Society of the Muslim Brothers (Arabic: جماعة الإخوان المسلمين‎‎Jami'ah al-Ikhwān al-Muslimūn), shortened to the Muslim Brotherhood (الإخوان المسلمون al-Ikhwān al-Muslimūn), is a transnational Sunni Islamist organization founded in Egypt by Islamic scholar and schoolteacher Hassan al-Banna in 1928.[1][2][3][4] The organisation gained supporters throughout the Arab world and influenced other Islamist groups such as Hamas[5] with its "model of political activism combined with Islamic charity work",[6] and in 2012 sponsored the elected political party in Egypt after the January Revolution in 2011."

    ......Interesting were they are considered terrorist activities.....

    "However, it suffered from periodic government crackdowns for alleged terrorist activities, and as of 2015 is considered a terrorist organization by the governments of Bahrain,[7][8] Egypt, Russia, Syria, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.[9][10][11][12]"

    "The Brotherhood's English language website describes the principles of the Muslim Brotherhood as including firstly the introduction of the Islamic Sharia as "the basis for controlling the affairs of state and society" and secondly, work to unify "Islamic countries and states, mainly among the Arab states, and liberating them from foreign imperialism".[30]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood

    A different slant...

    http://shariahthethreat.org/a-short-course-1-what-is-shariah/a-short-course-14-the-muslim-brotherhood%E2%80%99s-strategic-plan/

    This one really puts the family thus Hillary and the Clinton Foundation into perspective...

    "Hassan Abedin is currently an associate editor with the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), the in-house publication of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA). His sister, Huma Abedin, worked 12 years for IMMA and has longstanding ties to Hillary Rodham Clinton. His mother, Saleha Abedin, is a sociologist with ties to numerous Islamist organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood, and is known for her strong advocacy of Sharia Law. His father was the late Syed Abedin, an Indian-born scholar who taught at the Saudi-based King Abdulaziz University in the early 1970s before becoming the managing editor of JMMA."

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2558

  4. JC, A little while back you were going on about something along these lines,( U no how U do) and you made a statement something like, "the days of rampant government corruption are over, somebody should of told the Clinton's."

    That line stuck me then and more so everyday, you have great vision. Thanks for all you do.
    PTM

  5. Sue Warman's link

    Thoughts?

    ----------------------------------

    As above, so below?

    or

    Absolute power corrupts absolutely?

    I doubt anyone up there is saying, "You know we should give our power and the interest we got from the people, that gave us our power, back to the people".

    More likely they are watching their manipulations with glee while making mocking sounds not unlike a cow.

    Just extrapolating Hillary upward, below we have the Hillbullies....so yeah, this above below stuff seems to work.

  6. Hey JC,

    Before I started following your site I digested as much as I could from Alt Economic blogs. Charles Hugh Smith is a guy who I believe makes a lot of sense and is an all around well meaning guy.

    His post today talks about the Deep State walking away from Clinton. I believe its worth sharing even though for POM readers there is really nothing new here.

    http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct16/Hillary-blast-points10-16.html

    Congrats on the Top 100! I looked through several of the sites ahead of you and I don't see much competition in your way to number 1.

  7. "The IMF Launches Consultations on the Role of the Special Drawing Right with External Advisory Group
    October 31, 2016

    *The IMF has invited a group of experts to discuss the role of the SDRs
    *The group will assess whether and how a broader role for the SDR could contribute to the smooth functioning of the international monetary system"

    http://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2016/10/31/PR16474-IMF-Launches-Consultations-on-Role-of-Special-Drawing-Right-with-External-Advisory-Group

        1. Dane. I gave it a good go mate. It's impossible to unshackle oneself from the heavy chains of this US election. I tried. We are all going to start reading a whole lot more about the Clintons, Rothschilds, Marc Rich and Glencore [the North Korean connection by the looks..].

          1. I hear what your saying Alan. I leave that theater to get a breath of truth from time to time. But living in the US its really difficult to escape for any length of time.

            It will be interesting to see how people who viciously back Hillary now, will change or lie about their original position or continue to resist the truth by making excuses for their choice.

            The blind eye....syndrome.

  8. CIPS accelerates the internationalisation of the RMB

    "The use of global messaging standards by the new infrastructure is increasing RMB transaction volumes and accelerating the evolution of the RMB into a major global currency.The first anniversary of the launch of the cross-border interbank payments system (CIPS) in China has just passed. Its adoption of global payments messaging standards is now set not only to accelerate the growth of CIPS, but to further internationalise the renminbi (RMB)."

    https://www.swift.com/insights/news/cips-accelerates-the-internationalisation-of-the-rmb

  9. So which position is public and which is private? Aren't we moving into an ara of transparency or a consolidation of public and private?socialisticapitalism....haha a POM derived new word:) it could go with what you were saying JC in a merger of socialism and capitalism.

    https://youtu.be/pU1hE_G73Cs

    Ps. We can't claim the word...a quick Google search revealed someone used it over on reddit...:( still a cool word though...:)

    Reminds me of "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"

    https://youtu.be/tRFHXMQP-QU

  10. JC,

    Congratulations on the award and thank you for making this analysis available for free loaders.

    The fundamentals of multilateral investing lessons link return's a page not found error rather than a subscription page. Is this content still available to subscribers?

    Also, do these lessons contain a guide specific to investing in the SDR, or would a new subscriber piece this together through historic Premium POMs?

    From what I can gather from your Free POMs this should pick up pace in parallel with a dollar devaluation in the new year. Thus far I have some bullion but feel the need to educate myself with regards to taking advantage of the upcoming opportunities in this historic time.

    PS, the first part of your fiction piece is currently inaccessible (for me at least).

      1. In Warsaw it's customary to have a good meal followed by a belly full of vodka during the holiday's. Yesterday was All Saints Day and a bank holiday. I'm not sure who I'm talking to.

    1. So here is the point.

      I'm President Obama's Blackberry and I have the highest levels of encryption in the United States - at my end. NO ONE PERSON NOR SINGLE GOVERNMENT can penetrate my mobile device and it's email receiving capabilities.

      However, I decide to SEND classified material via Blackberry to Hillary Clinton that I feel is secure - at my end. Why? Because I have a secure device... right?
      [did anyone pick up on that link I provided above]

      C'mon world this is more than just senile incompetence..

      This is yuuuge. What should be considered is that this material HAS been hacked - and hacked a long time ago. Has America been attacked on it's own soil? NO. Why? It looks like alot of potential haters have had this info for a loooooong time.

      P.s. It is possible that those attempts have been made however they have clearly been neutralized. Thank God for sane people in the know, right?

      ...CSI - a solid POM point.

  11. Wikileaks just released Part 27 of the Podesta emails. Here is the subreddit investigating these emails. The Email ID of Podesta Part 27 is in a range of 43525 - 44648. Here is how to use google to search just those emails in that range:

    Example 1
    site:wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/ 43525..44648

    Example 2 - with additional keyword(s) search
    site:wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/ 43525..44648 obama
    site:wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/ 43525..44648 clinton foundation

  12. Two names Hector Morenco - Steve Pieczenik - I'll leave it to others for the truthiness of the presentations. Big indeed-

    Sue-

    Day-to-Day Operations

    "Acting as a central bank, the BIS has sweeping powers to do anything for its own account or for the account of its member central banks. It is like a two-way power-of-attorney - any party can act as agent for any other party".

    Article 21 of the original BIS statutes define day-to-day operations:

    buying and selling of gold coin or bullion for its own account or for the account of central banks
    holding gold for its own account under reserve in central banks
    accepting the supervision of gold for the account of central banks
    making advances to or borrowing from central banks against gold, bills of exchange, and other short-term obligations of prime liquidity or other approved securities
    --------

    First link from the link in my above post.

    I doubt anyone knows the extent or even where a good portion of the already mined yellow stuff is physically sitting. Which explains, in part, why they buy it yet discourage others, at least in the US, from buying it.

  13. This is kind of a story.

    As you can see in my comments above, I have been providing google search links to Wikileaks releases of the Podesta Email chain:
    Part #27
    Part #28
    Part #29

    Let's take the latest release from Wikileaks that I commented on, as my example. If you click the link I provided you can see that google search result go 52 pages deep:

    site:wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/ 45958..47725
    [screenshot A - screenshot B]

    Wikileaks just released Part 30 of the Podesta emails. Here is the subreddit investigating these emails. The Email ID of Podesta Part 30 is in a range of 47725 - 48286. HOWEVER, Google seems to censoring the search results:

    site:wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/ 47725..48286.

    Results:
    Google records 10,200 search results
    Google only shows 2 pages of results - outside of the range query.

    This is kind of a big story. I think the internet just broke.

    1. It does appear as if Google's search engine is not operating in the same capacity for the Wikileaks #30 Podesta Email dump as it had been doing for previous dumps.

      Google is now reporting 11,000 search results 4 pages deep.On the 1st page of results it shows:
      About 11,000 results (0.27 seconds)

      While on the 4th page it shows:
      Page 4 of 31 results (0.27 seconds)

      Anyways, it's probably just a coding/search engine/timing thing that will be resolved in the next few hours. I wasn't paying attention on the last few dumps but it didn't seem to take google this long to render results. We will see. I'm paying attention now.

        1. It would appear as if we are getting more search results for the search query I provided. Not exactly, pay good attention. The google search results [per page] are still straying well outside of the original search query number range.

          There should be 560 uniquely identified emails released in the Wikileaks #30 Podesta Email dump ranging with an Email ID between 47725 and 48286, right?

          Let's consider that google generally posts 10 search results per page. If I fiddle with the search query I posted above the best I can get is 10 pages deep of search results - most of which DO NOT match the number range provided in the search query:

          site:wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/ 47725..48200

          That's still only 100 search results from a potential 560 which Wikileaks released well over 5hrs ago now.

          Again, I have not seen this with any other Wikileaks Podesta Email dump. Not saying it's unique, just saying I haven't observed them all. The ones that I have observed prior to #30 have not been limited by google search results like this dump has.

  14. The contention that “A few decades from now both the Christian religion and the Islamic faith will be destroyed and replaced with the inevitable synthesis of the consolidation of both” is silly, and blind to centuries of history. Being atheist I take no joy in pointing out that neither faith managed to destroy the other during the Crusades, and it is no more likely to happen in our age.

Leave a Reply