Educated vs Uneducated Voters – The Unavoidable Truth on Cultural Segregation and a Changing Political Demographic

JcollinsCultural16 Comments

By JC Collins

An ideal Republic demands an informed population which can serve as an electoral body of critical thinkers. Past educational programs within distinct societies and civilizations have been tasked with providing this body of critical thinkers.

As is the case in previous eras, civilizations which transition through various stages of socioeconomic development invariably pass through the obvious periods of enlightenment and heightened culture only to bottom out when civilization reverses and a period of non-critical thinking and mob mentality controls the mechanisms of governance and power.

There are many reasons for the predictability of such a cultural evolution and devolution.

One is the periods of decadence which serve to weaken the power structures and societal foundations. These periods of decadence are preceded by massive expansions of the money supply which inject excess capital into the domestic economies and lead to the waste associated with the onset of decadence.

This erosion and degeneration of cultural responsibility and accountability leads to even further fragmentation of Republic ideals as those who rise to positions of power and control within the governance and commerce frameworks begin to legislate socialist mandates.

These mandates are meant to warp the judicial and educational structures within the civilization for the purpose of establishing and maintaining a cultural segregation which promotes equality but in fact is attempting to encourage further division and redistribution to those at the top of the power structure.

Under such a methodology, sometimes planned and sometimes unplanned, all the civil and official institutions exist to serve the growing power structure. The educational system, once meant to produce a mass population of organized critical thinkers shifts to the far left of the cultural spectrum where it is focused primarily on producing a mass population of disorganized non-critical thinkers who are trained to operate the machinery and mechanisms of the governance and commerce structures but are never educated enough to threaten those at the top of the power structure itself.

This de facto caste type system continues to grow until a mass swell of critical thinkers within the disorganized masses are able to organize and begin the process of sovereign renewal throughout the multiple levels of commerce, education and politics.

It is as if the utter lack of critical thinking reaches a point where it actually sparks a new awareness and birth of critical thinking which then begins the process of rising and challenging the power structure.
One of the clear indicators that this transformation has begun is the weakening of the educational system which materializes through a growing division in the electoral body. We are experiencing such divisions and fragmentation now as the election of Donald Trump and the BREXIT vote in Great Britain would suggest.

In both cases the left power structure has hammered the point that it was predominately “uneducated voters” who moved against the existing framework and are attempting to overthrow those at the top. This slanderous attempt at cultural segregation is transparent in that it draws attention to the false promotion of equality which the power structure promotes.

The inevitable corruption and devolution of the educational system ensures that this mass body of “uneducated voters” will develop the critical thinking which is required in order to recognize the corruption and inherent degeneration of the existing framework.

Those who consider themselves to be “educated voters” are in fact conditioned and moulded to maintain and perpetuate the existing power structure. This is accomplished through refocusing the purpose of the educational system from building critical thinkers to such mundane and counter intuitive tasks as conforming and bending to cultural group think.

Those who have avoided the educational system for whatever reason – costs, no interest, not fitting in, etc.. – find themselves in the advantageous position of not having been subjected to the curriculum of mass socioeconomic and cultural engineering. This avoidance of the control integration points both allows and encourages the development of critical thinking as a direct response to the lack of critical thinking which will have reached epidemic proportions within the existing system.

This disenfranchised and disorganized mass begins to organize itself and use the gears and levers of the governance framework to take back control of the system. The once “educated” demographic begins to find itself faced with a mass population of electoral voters who have developed both critical thinking and the ability to recognize the inherent and degenerate characteristics of the collapsing and fragmenting system.

The ruling demographic of “educated” and non-critical thinking electoral voters find themselves confused and unable to understand why the cultural mechanisms of socialism and equality are now falling apart under the weight of the growing demographic of “uneducated” and critical thinking electoral voters. The contradiction between promoting cultural equality while granting special interest groups and pre-defined minority groups select privileges never occurs to them. This cultural segregation takes the form of special laws of exclusion and inclusion which is enforced upon another demographic as the opposite. Inclusion for one demographic means exclusion for another.

The culture begins to develop multi-tiered legal, educational, and business micro frameworks which isolate those “uneducated” masses who have not participated in the macro framework of social inclusion and non-critical thinking. The divide only grows broader from this point as the disorganized masses organize and critical thinking begins to be injected once again into the mechanisms of governance and power.

This will inevitably lead once again to the implementation of Republican ideals and the expansion of an electoral body of critical thinkers. The governance and power frameworks begin to focus once again on the application of a common law for all demographics and the reintroduction of educational, financial, monetary, and political sovereignty. – JC

16 Comments on “Educated vs Uneducated Voters – The Unavoidable Truth on Cultural Segregation and a Changing Political Demographic”

  1. HI JC, thank you for this latest intuitive insight. There seem to be many levels of gangland corruption going on. At national level you have governments who will have wars each election so see who gets control, then there are NGO’s who creep ever further in to the mix, coming right down to the local crooks who work as part of a gang. But above all these are the ones that even governments have to obey, the ones who set the mandate of the IMF in other words, the gang that control earth. These are the ones who do understand the laws of Karma, they supply all information for their plans and some, like yourself put the ideas and plots into focus. Best Wishes. Bill

  2. Excellent post JC, thank you so much. As I was reading I kept picturing that image you tweeted a while back. The caption said the following.

    Hard times create strong men.

    Strong men create good times.

    Good times create weak men.

    Weak men create hard times.

    Then it faded into this thought.

    If we take the Republican and Democratic positions that have ruled the US political system for a long time now we see that the pendulum swings in one direction for…well 8 years now, then back the other way for 8 years. This would give one a picture of 8 steps forward then 8 steps backward equating to 0 or a sense of arrested evolution for the society.

    Now as I unplug to begin the work day I’m left with an understanding that….

    There is no beginning or end. Therefore, at my current skillset it’s an infinite cycle or in computer programming speak perhaps an endless loop that tends to steal or consume the majority of a cpu’s computing power.

    All that being said what if the cycle has to be? Could we transform our infinite loop into…hmm, I don’t know, perhaps the cycle of life?

    What was this post about? hahahaha just kidding JC :).

  3. “‘Common-Sense Legislation’ Would Shield Drivers Who Run Over Protesters | US News”

    “Tennessee bill would make drivers immune from civil liability if they hit protesters in street
    FOX31 Denver – 2 days agoAMP”

    https://www.google.com/search?q=run+over+protesters+bill&oq=run+over+protesters+bill&aqs=chrome..69i57j33l2.11485j0j4&client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

    Oh boy this sounds like trouble. Watch it be an angry liberal who hits them…

    1. Watching the protests from the UK, one thing that stuck out for me was how all of these protests are taking place in the cities and on campuses which are the strongholds of left liberal thinking and HRC supporters. Like the one to stop Devos at the school in NYC where over 90% of people who voted are registered Democrats.

      Surely that is an own goal and is more likely to produce a situation where an angry liberal driver would collide with an angry liberal protestor. All the damage being done will be paid for by (angry) liberal taxpayers.

      How does destroying your own back yard help their cause? They are hardly taking their fight to their enemy, the deplorables. When they ‘attack’ Trump, they are really attacking the people who voted him into power, but indirectly. Again they are avoiding a direct confrontation with those they say they oppose, the ‘uneducated’ people.

      All the talk of civil war in the US can only come about if these people take it out of their citadels of weakening power and onto the true battlefield. The outcome at that point may not be what they expect. Just because you start a war, does not mean you will win the war.

    2. I would like to add that in the event that the reports that the US Army is preparing for urban warfare on the streets of America are truly going to come about, then again the people they will be taking out are these same protesters. No doubt Trump will be blamed for the resulting police state and possibly martial law, but who set it up? I wonder at how dysfunctional they have to be not to see the monster they themselves have created.

      1. I agree Fiona. Thats the growing sentiment here in the minds of the “uneducated”, “deplorables”.

        The liberal mindset is so far from center that it cannot detect where the center is anymore. I believe this is what happens to groups of liberal people who have allowed themselves to become second hand people and no longer possess the ability to lead themselves. They don’t seem to want the responsibility of managing their own sovereignty, which would include being accountable for their own actions…can’t have that.

        Now that a liberal, their guiding light is not leading them from the big seat they don’t like it and they don’t know how to live.

        What is interesting though is the absence of mentioning other liabilities within the same act. The article seems to have picked up on what they feel is most important which is the civil liability $$$. But what about the criminal liability for vehicular manslaughter, or hitting someone and leaving the scene of the accident?

        I see this legislation as misleading if it doesn’t address all the liabilities involved for such a situation. Wonder what two pieces of legislation they will remove? Sure sounds a lot like the M103 Islamophobia legislation that JC and fellow Canadians are looking at. Both seem to have the same underlying current. Maybe its only intent is to cause an uproar or to put folks on notice.

        1. We all seem to refer to this as a liberal mindset when truly at the heart of this there is no liberalism only Socialism, which is the Globalists’ preferred means of controlling the world. It appears that in the sense of the ‘end justifies the means’, the end game is just to establish Socialism in America and elsewhere as you can see in Europe.

          It is like they are mindless to the consequences of their actions. They have been ‘schooled‘ (I don’t call it an education any more) within their echo chambers to the point where taking any form of personal responsibility is beyond them.

          For those pushing this agenda it doesn’t matter what the outcome for the people is as long as it’s a Socialist system. I doubt any of them truly understand what Socialism means, let alone what living under that system would entail. The blinkers (think you call them blinders in the US) are fixed in place and they don’t want to really see what’s around them, while fixated on what they think is in front of them…..utopia!

          1. Hi Fiona, I wanted to say I agree with you regarding the usage of the term Liberal, whereas it is indeed Socialism and more like Marxism with a soft makeup. So yes, Liberal is used as a cover for Socialism that has no elements of the John Locke’s Liberalism whatsoever. This is yet another example of wordplay by the demonically possessed left and their eternal game of deception.

            The interchangeably used terms reminded me of the “Judeans people’s front” versus “people’s front of Judea” from the 1979 Monty Python movie, Life of Brian. lol

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4

          2. Great points Fiona and carpe-diem.

            Maybe we can say that the liberal mindset is unwilling to manage itself. Therefore, the result is more laws in order to keep societal order from the chaotic actions of the bodies which the liberal minds are unwilling to manage at a conscious level.

  4. The cultural Stagnation we are witnessing today, is to a big part due to the massive drop of journalistic standards that is supposed to form the Fourth state and outright “Fake News”.

    The following short 3 minute interview by CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, you will notice she is not interviewing Madam Le Pen, but rather interrogating and worse still she is not interested in the interviewee’s answers whatsoever. Amanpour’s primarily objective is to argue against her and win and show how incompetent and how out of line with the “accepted” narrative Le Pen is! Very shocking indeed.

    Is there a surprise we now have a largely ill informed population?

    Exactly, who these “news” outlets as CNN is responsible too?

    She would be well suited to Izvestia/ Pravda during the Stalin’s reign. What exactly is the purpose of such rude, arrogant and bullying individual and her propaganda organization? Informing the masses is definitely not one of them!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_XeQs5n5js

  5. The liberal mindset thinks the reserved or conservative mindset is ignorant. I believe this is a mistake.

    The US seems to have become so complicit that we believe it takes a person with an advanced degree to understand all the nonsensical legislation in order to navigate through it. I believe its do to all the “codified” legislation. This legislation was implemented in order to create the complicit state thereby creating the false need for citizens to believe an advanced degree is a prerequisite for being president. John McCain told Trump that he would “codify” the sanctions Obama put on Russia if Trump removes them.

    Trump removes this veil and shows the US citizenry that the common man can be president. Furthermore, he is taking a stand against complicit legislation with his executive order for new legislation submittal which requires that for each new piece of legislation two old pieces of legislation needs to be removed. We can make America great again.

  6. JC here in the states people are withdrawing from once friends over who they voted for. People on the left are such slaves to their masters as you pointed out. The Trump supporters I know are not comfortable that Trump can lead now that he has choosen some poor candidates for postions. Once Goldman Sucks boys got on board the Trump Administration started taking on water. Why did he not keep his campaign promises? It’s all over before the party got started.

    1. Thank you Speedspirit, It’s only been day 38 days I believe and Trump admin embarked on a path that will change things radically, POM great articles by our JC reflected on these. I can tell you that those who were with Trump are with Trump and will be with him. At least those who understand how terrible things are and what is possible to change. I can not believe people can be so wishy washy on his side, not the Right, not the real Right. By that I mean the NeoCons are NOT Right and they are NOT Conservative but more of a liquid tendency when it comes to their beleif system in aligning with the right. NeoCons are currently battling for their own survival and truly they should be seen in the same camp as the Left. Both are doomed!

      As for the Left, well they are also in their deathbeds as has been discussed here numerous times, for the simple reason that they have lost all moral compass, and a political philosophy that is cohesive enough to bind the now disparate gangs together.

      Trump will undoubtedly make mistakes and even big mistakes along the way, but looking at his cabinet team one thing that stands out is that they are entirely from the non-professional Political classes. They are almost all very wealthy and have achieved their career objectives. Highly experienced and well connected people as Tillerson is recognized internationally from his oil background. In fact world leaders respect this gentleman far more that Kerry and his predecessors since they were all Amateurs pretending to be Professional diplomats! As for the generals, well again, they are professional soldiers and they know better than anybody that wars are bad and should be avoided at all costs. They know a war is easy to start but extremely difficult to finish and the result is often unknown. This is drilled in their heads at war colleges they have attended. The Generals are also highly qualified with Phd’s in History and other skill set that is required for a general that leads an army. Generals also know enough about the capability of armies they manage to know what is effective and what is not depending on each theatre of operation. Amateur politicians lack such wisdom.

      As for the Mnuchin and Bannon who were at Goldman Sachs, the justification is simple again. In order to dismantle a system, you must know the internals of a system! You can not guess as to the internals and inner workings of such big monster as the Wall Street, so you need engineers of the monster machine.

      Furthermore, there is a lot of talk on why so many “Jews” are helping Trump! This is partly the reflection of a massive cleansing that the Jewish world is going through herself. The Jewish Atheists who are almost exclusively of a Leftist and even Marxist reactionary tendencies are at war with the Jewish people who are like any other people with a history and rituals and are fed up with the destructive behaviour of the reactionary cults within the Jewish system of beleif who happen to run Hollywood, and other MSM in the US and Europe. They are the Globalists and generally have given a bad name to the Jews everywhere. This inner cult existed for ever and the Left side has been defining the narrative and things have taken a different turning now. Distinguishing the two camps helps in clarifying what is actually going on.

      The great article by Dr. Pieczenik in this regard will hopefully be of interest to you. Piczenik is himself of a Jewish Russian heritage.

      http://stevepieczenik.com/anti-semitism-on-the-rise/

  7. Left (adj.) – opposite of right, weak, foolish, lameness, paralysis, worthless, twisted, crooked, friendlier (in a sinister way), considered conspicuous, the better one, desirable, irregular, illicit, opposite of what is expressed.

    The “phrase out in left field “out of touch with pertinent realities” is attested from 1944, from the baseball fielding position that tends to be far removed from the play (left field in baseball attested by 1867).”

    Left (n) – the left-hand side, the side opposite the right, In military formations with reference to the center; of river banks it implies going in the direction the current flows, the democratic or liberal party.

    http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=left&allowed_in_frame=0

    Right (adv.) – straight, direct.

    Right (n.) – morally right, duty, obligation, rule of conduct, law of a land, what someone deserves, a just claim, what is due, correctness, truth, a legal entitlement, a privilege, a right action, a good deed.

    Right (v.) – to straighten, rule, set up, set right, amend, guide, govern, restore, replace.

    Right (adj.) – morally correct, just, good, fair, proper, fitting, straight, not bent, direct, erect, move in a straight line, to rule, to lead straight, to put right.

    http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=right

Leave a Reply